Public sector

Maintenance planning for public buildings: a guide

By Lara Hubacher, Facility Management Project Lead · Published: · Updated: · Reading time: approx. 12 min

Schools, care homes, administrative buildings and sports facilities are significant assets owned by the public sector. Those who plan their maintenance instead of merely reacting to damage protect these assets and spare the budget in the long term.

This guide shows what belongs to Maintenance planning , which intervals are usual in practice, how an annual plan comes about and how the planned work reaches the caretaking team's weekly schedule. It is aimed at municipalities, school districts, works departments and property managers who want to put their maintenance on a transparent basis.

Reactive or planned?

Reactive maintenance only kicks in once something is broken. That is expensive, unpredictable and disrupts operations. Planned maintenance turns this around: activities are scheduled in advance, before damage occurs. This increases the availability of buildings and distributes costs predictably over time.

The difference lies not only in convenience but in the cost consequences. A reactive operation pays emergency surcharges, weekend call-outs and consequential damage. It works with temporary solutions, loses rooms for teaching or for public use and has to request budgets outside the regular process. Planned maintenance, by contrast, buys services at normal rates, bundles work into the holidays or the off-season and keeps the fabric in usable condition for longer.

Worked example: checking roof drains

A school building has two flat roof areas with a total of six drains. The planned inspection and cleaning twice a year takes around three hours each time, so 6 hours in total. At internal full costs of 45 CHF per hour, this precaution costs around 270 CHF per year.

If the inspection is not carried out and a drain blocks, water presses into the structure. Experience shows that repairing soaked insulation, ceiling and floor covering in a single classroom quickly runs into tens of thousands of francs, plus substitute rooms during the construction period. At 270 CHF per year, the precaution is therefore cheaper over decades than a single incident.

The life cycle of a property

Every public building goes through the same phases: planning and construction, use and operation, periodic renewal of individual components and finally full refurbishment or replacement. The use phase is by far the longest. Over the entire service life, the larger share of the costs arises not during construction but in operation and maintenance. That is exactly where planning has the greatest effect.

It helps to distinguish three levels:

  • Operation: the ongoing activities that keep day-to-day operations running, cleaning, caretaking services, operating the plant, Outdoor areas, winter service.
  • Maintenance: the recurring work that preserves the condition, servicing, inspection, minor repairs, readjustment.
  • Repair and renewal: the replacement of components at the end of their service life, floor coverings, blinds, heating replacement, facade, roof.

The first two levels run through the annual budget and through the positions of the Caretaking. The third level belongs in multi-year financial planning. If you derive both levels from the same Asset inventory , you only have to maintain the basics once.

What maintenance planning involves

  • Asset inventory: a clean overview of buildings, floors, rooms and outdoor areas. The structured recording of objects and areas is the basis of every further calculation.
  • Plant and components: which heating, which ventilation, which lift, which floor coverings, which play equipment, with year of construction, make and last service.
  • Recurring activities: Maintenance and deep cleaning, window cleaning, seasonal work and inspections.
  • Intervals and dates: what is due when, across weeks, season and year.
  • Responsibilities: who carries out a task and who checks it, in-house or through a specialist company.
  • Hours required: how much time the planned work ties up and how that compares with the available FTE percentages .
  • Documentation: what was done, by whom, with what findings. For the public sector, this evidence is just as important as the work itself.

Typical intervals at a glance

The following overview summarises which plant and components in public buildings need regular attention. It does not replace manufacturer specifications or official requirements, but it helps when setting up a first plan.

Plant or componentTypical intervalResponsible
Heating, heat generationService annually before the heating season, operational check monthlySpecialist company, visual check by caretaking
Ventilation and filtersFilter change 1 to 2 times a year, plant servicing annuallySpecialist company, filter check by caretaking
Electrical installationPeriodic inspection as required by the grid operatorLicensed specialist company
Emergency lighting and escape routesFunction test monthly, specialist inspection annuallyCaretaking, specialist company
Roof and sheet metal workDrains and gutters 2 times a year, specialist inspection every 2 to 3 yearsCaretaking, specialist company
FacadeVisual check annually, cleaning or painting every 10 to 20 yearsCaretaking, specialist company
Windows and blindsWindow cleaning 2 to 4 times a year, blind servicing annuallyCleaning, specialist company for drives
Floor coveringsDeep cleaning 1 to 2 times a year, re-finishing depending on the coveringCleaning, specialist company
Sanitary installations and water pipesFlushing of rarely used pipes periodically, descaling annuallyCaretaking, specialist company
Fire protectionExtinguishers and systems as specified, visual check of escape routes monthlySpecialist company, caretaking
LiftServicing 2 to 4 times a year, emergency call and function test monthlyLift company, check by caretaking
Playground and outdoor areasVisual check weekly, main inspection annuallyCaretaking, specialist for the main inspection

Indicative values for orientation, as at October 2026.

Manufacturer specifications, insurance requirements and cantonal or municipal regulations always take precedence over these indicative values. Check the requirements that apply to your plant before you extend intervals.

From interval to annual plan

A list of intervals is not yet a plan. It only becomes an annual plan once every interval is given a date and an hours value. The way there runs in four steps:

  1. Collect: list all recurring work per building, including the activities that today exist only in the caretaker's head.
  2. Assess: assign a realistic duration and a frequency to each task. This gives the Annual hours per activity.
  3. Schedule: distribute the work across weeks, months and seasonal windows. Noisy or room-bound work belongs in the holidays.
  4. Allocate: assign each task to a person or a company and reconcile it with the available hours.

For converting hours into positions, a net annual working time of 1,840 hours per full-time position is the benchmark in Switzerland. This value takes into account 42 hours per week, 5 weeks of holiday, 9 public holidays and around 3 percent absences. How this conversion works in detail is shown in the article Calculating FTE percent for caretaking.

Example: annual plan for a school building

A school building with 3,000 m2 of Cleaning area and 39 school weeks shows how a complete annual plan is made up. Cleaning forms the largest block; the remaining caretaking tasks are spread over the year.

Service blockTime windowHours per year
Routine cleaning39 school weeks2'091
Deep and special cleaningSummer holidays and other holidays210
Outdoor areas and grounds maintenanceMarch to October380
Winter serviceNovember to March120
Technical checks and maintenanceall year, focus on the holidays190
Lettings and eventsall year, focus on weekends150
Ancillary work and caretaking servicesall year109
Total caretaking3'250

Indicative values for orientation, as at October 2026.

The routine cleaning of 2,091 hours and the deep and special cleaning of around 210 hours together come to around 2,300 hours, i.e. about 125 FTE percent for the cleaning alone. With all the other blocks, the school building reaches 3,250 hours or around 177 FTE percent. At internal full costs of 45 CHF per hour, the cleaning alone costs 103,500 CHF per year.

This calculation has two advantages. First, it shows the committee what the positions are used for, not as a lump sum, but block by block. Second, it makes changes visible: if a pavilion is added or the gym is let more often, the additional requirement can be expressed in hours instead of assumptions. How such hours values turn into allocations and workloads is shown in the overview of Workloads and allocation.

How maintenance gets into the weekly schedule

A plan only takes effect when it reaches everyday operations. That's why route and annual planning, task allocation and an easy way to report defects belong together. When the caretaker reports a broken door in room 125, it becomes a trackable task, with a clear status through to completion.

In practice, splitting the weekly schedule into three has proven itself:

  • Fixed daily work: cleaning by room group, inspection rounds, waste, opening and locking up. These blocks repeat and set the rhythm of the week.
  • Planned maintenance for the week: two to four items from the annual plan, for example testing the emergency lighting, checking play equipment, adjusting blinds.
  • Reserve for reports: a time window for defects and short-term requests. Without this reserve, every disruption displaces a planned task.

If the annual plan is broken down into weeks, the inspections are spread evenly instead of piling up in the autumn. The Route and annual planning takes over this distribution and shows for each week how many hours are committed and where there is still room.

Defect reports and recurring tasks

Every plan meets reality. A lamp fails, a window handle breaks, a teacher reports a sticking door. Such defect reports are not a disruption to the planning but its most important feedback. If they are recorded instead of just being passed on verbally, a history builds up per room and per installation. If reports accumulate at the same place, that indicates a component at the end of its service life. At the same time, it is a factual argument for renewal planning.

The counterpart to the reports is recurring tasks. A recurring task is an activity that is created again automatically: monthly testing of the emergency lighting, weekly playground inspection, half-yearly cleaning of roof drains. Nobody has to remember it. It appears by itself in the week it is due and leaves a dated record when it is completed. Together, tasks and notifications thus cover both directions: the planned work from above and the observed reality from below.

Useful rule of thumb: every report that arrives for the second time about the same component should be investigated, either the cause is fixed or the component goes on the renewal list.

Particularities of the public sector

Public clients must justify funds and make spending transparent. Structured planning provides exactly this basis: the maintenance need is transparent, budgets are documentable and tenders are based on objective figures instead of rules of thumb.

Budget process

Municipal budgets are drawn up months before they are executed. Anyone who needs plausible figures for the coming year in early summer cannot rely on experience alone. An annual plan with hours and hourly rates provides the item in the budget request and at the same time explains what is behind it. Deviations during execution can then be justified instead of merely noted.

Value preservation

Public properties are held for decades. Deferred maintenance does not disappear, it just becomes due later and more expensively. Planning that records intervals and service lives makes this connection visible and protects the fabric across legislative periods.

Evidence for the municipal council and the auditors

Authorities, audit committees and insurers do not ask whether work was done but whether it is documented. Documented inspections with date, person and findings are the simplest evidence. In the event of a claim, they are the decisive one. Complete records are particularly worthwhile for fire protection, emergency lighting, play equipment and lifts.

Succession when staff change

In many municipalities, the knowledge about the properties sits with a single person. When the long-serving caretaker retires, that knowledge goes with them unless it has been recorded. A documented asset inventory with installations, intervals and suppliers shortens onboarding from months to weeks. For institutions with several properties, this is one of the strongest reasons for the digitalisation of building maintenance.

The benefit

  • Value preservation instead of costly emergencies.
  • Plannable costs spread over the year.
  • Higher availability and fewer operational disruptions.
  • A transparent basis for budgets and tenders.
  • Verifiable inspections for committees, the auditors and insurers.
  • Secured knowledge about the properties, independent of individual people.

FAQ

Where should a municipality start if it has recorded nothing so far?

With the asset inventory of a single property. Record buildings, floors, rooms, areas and the most important installations. Then add the recurring work. One complete property is worth more than ten half-recorded ones. After that you repeat the pattern, since the structure is already in place.

How many hours in the annual plan should be reserved for unforeseen work?

In practice, a reserve in the range of 5 to 10 percent of the annual hours is often used. If the share of unplanned work is permanently much higher, that is usually a sign of deferred maintenance and not of bad luck.

Is cleaning part of maintenance planning?

Organisationally they are two topics, but in calculation terms they belong together: both tie up hours of the same people and both are based on the same areas. That is why it is worth planning cleaning and technical maintenance from one asset inventory. How the cleaning side is calculated is explained in the article Cleaning calculation explained.

Do you need software for this?

For a small property, a carefully maintained spreadsheet is enough at first. As soon as several buildings, several people and recurring records are added, maintaining it by hand becomes laborious and error-prone. The article What is CAFM? describes what specialist software does here. The application for municipalities and schools is shown on the page for public institutions.

Conclusion

Plannable maintenance is the cheaper option, for the budget and for the fabric. Three things are decisive: a complete asset inventory, realistic intervals with hours values and a way for the planned work actually to reach the week. easyCAFM combines asset inventory, calculation, planning and tasks in one software and so makes the maintenance of public buildings manageable end to end.

About the author
Lara Hubacher, Facility Management Project Lead, writes about caretaking, maintenance planning and the digitalisation of building maintenance. More about the team
Back to the blog
In easyCAFM

Related modules for this topic.

Free & non-binding

Plan the maintenance before it plans you.

We'll show you easyCAFM using your infrastructure.